The statement addresses a public issue involving the Department of Justice, Apple, and the removal of an app, drawing parallels to previous cases of government influence over tech companies. It discusses legal and free speech implications, contributing to civic dialogue on government intervention and corporate responsibility.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it presents a factual account and comparison.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by comparing the current situation to a past event, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing the legality and implications of government actions on corporate decisions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.