The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the limits of reporting and free speech in the context of national security and legal issues. It references the concept of a 'D Notice' in Britain, which is a system for voluntary self-censorship of the media in matters of national security, and contrasts it with the U.S. approach to free speech and reporting.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions. It discusses the concept of free speech and reporting without inciting harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in a dialogue about legal and ethical issues related to free speech and reporting. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by discussing the importance of allowing people to report what they see, even in sensitive situations. It uses the platform responsibly to highlight differences in national approaches to media censorship. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.