Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement criticizes the European Commission for alleged misconduct and suggests a bias in its actions, framing it as a battle for freedom of expression. The tone is accusatory and suggests a conspiracy or cover-up, which can be inflammatory.
- The statement may cause harm by spreading potentially unfounded accusations, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals or entities involved, potentially engaging in cyberbullying or harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and divisive. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to potentially spread misinformation or biased views, not necessarily for the betterment of society. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- While it upholds free speech, it may not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to the accusatory and potentially misleading nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.