Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement addresses a significant public issue involving a large fine under the Digital Services Act, suggesting it is not about transparency but rather a different agenda. This engages with public discourse on regulatory practices and corporate accountability.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm but rather aims to clarify the situation, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By providing an alternative perspective on the fine, the statement promotes understanding and encourages critical thinking about regulatory actions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the EU's actions, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.