Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -94
Anna Paulina Luna
@realannapaulina
·
9d
Co-sponsoring this.
12/10/2025, 6:44:53 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
9d
America’s relationship with Europe could change faster than people realize.
Thomas Massie
@RepThomasMassie
·
9d
NATO is a Cold War relic. The United States should withdraw from NATO and use that money to defend our country, not socialist countries.

Today, I introduced HR 6508 to end our NATO membership.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
14d
Europe is in direct violation of the NATO Treaty. Americans signed up to protect free democracies, not authoritarian censorship states. I will travel to Europe next week to directly warn EU lawmakers that the @EU_Commission is putting their security and lives in danger. 🚨🚨🚨
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
14d
You say it's not about censorship ("content moderation") but it is. You want to censor who gets verified. And you want X to give government-picked "researchers" special access to data so they can demand censorship. The Twitter Files revealed your censorship-by-proxy scam.

The statement and its context involve a discussion on international relations, NATO, and censorship, which are significant public issues. The tone is urgent and critical, focusing on perceived violations and security concerns.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about security and censorship, aiming to protect democratic values, which aligns with doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement accuses the EU of authoritarian censorship, which could be seen as disrespectful, potentially violating the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding of perceived threats to democracy, aligning with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is critical and accusatory, which may not fully engage in constructive dialogue, potentially violating this principle. [-1]