Jake Tapper

Rank 9 of 47

Score 107

Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅

It’s hard to overstate how much this post was unhelpful to the president’s cause among Indiana Republicans in the final hours when some were still persuadable.

Heritage Action

@Heritage_Action

13d

President Trump has made it clear to Indiana leaders: if the Indiana Senate fails to pass the map, all federal funding will be stripped from the state.

Roads will not be paved. Guard bases will close. Major projects will stop. These are the stakes and every NO vote will be to

12/12/2025, 2:06:49 AM

The statement critiques a post related to President Trump's influence on Indiana Republicans regarding a Senate vote. It suggests that the post was counterproductive to the president's objectives, particularly in persuading undecided Republicans. The tone is analytical, focusing on the political strategy and its effectiveness.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it critiques a political strategy, which is a neutral action in this context.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is focused on political strategy rather than fostering dialogue or empathy.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of a political strategy without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]