Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement addresses a public issue concerning the integrity of Oliver Sacks' work, which has implications for the fields of neuroscience and psychology. It engages in public discourse by discussing the impact of potential fabrications on scientific understanding and public trust.
- The statement does not directly harm others but expresses disappointment, which is a reasonable reaction to the alleged fabrications.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on the actions rather than personal attacks on Oliver Sacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of truth in scientific discourse. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the issue of fabrications without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is not the author's responsibility in this context.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing the implications of the alleged fabrications. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.