Marianne Williamson

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 65
12/14/2025, 8:59:50 PM
X
In reply to:
Jamaal 🐅 🚴 🇵🇸
@JamaalKemp8
·
2d
@marwilliamson That's the problem, with all due respect you don't properly understand the history. You've called an established genocide a "war" many times. And you've had to backtrack and correct statements. Study Norman Finkelstein, or Miko Peled. Learn
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
2d
@JamaalKemp8 I know exactly what it means. Anyone who knows anything about the history of the region for the last 40 years knows what it means. You also know nothing about me. https://marianne2024.com/israel-…
Jamaal 🐅 🚴 🇵🇸
@JamaalKemp8
·
2d
@marwilliamson You don't speak Arabic, it just means "uprising". That's it, nothing about violence. Stick to crystals and tarot cards. And focus on the starving, freezing, suffering children in Gaza, who you've done nothing to protect.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
2d
It would be great if those who have been shouting “Global Intifada” would revisit that phrase right now. It is not a “harmless left wing slogan.” It is a call to blame - and kill - Jews who have nothing, absolutely nothing to do with the actions of the Israeli government. It is

The statement is part of a broader discussion on the Israel-Palestine conflict, a significant public issue. The tone is dismissive, suggesting that listening to Norman Finkelstein leads to being misled, which implies a critique of the source rather than engaging with the content of the argument.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but dismisses a source without engaging with the content, which could be seen as indirectly dismissive. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it dismisses a source without engaging in substantive dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the source rather than addressing the argument presented. [-1]