In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
4d
The statement 'Stop this madness, @wesstreeting' is a direct response to a discussion about the ethical concerns surrounding the trial of puberty blockers for children. The tone is urgent and critical, indicating strong disagreement with the actions being discussed.
- The statement aims to prevent harm by opposing the trial, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in harassment or hate speech, but the use of 'madness' could be seen as dismissive, slightly impacting the respect for dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or provide detailed criticism, focusing instead on a strong emotional reaction. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.