Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with issues of censorship, governance, and security within the EU. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting that certain EU leaders are implementing totalitarian policies that threaten European security. The statement aims to raise awareness and provoke discussion about these policies.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by making strong accusations without providing evidence, which may incite fear or distrust. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals mentioned, as it accuses them of threatening security without substantiated evidence. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses charged language to criticize without fostering constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it makes personal attacks rather than focusing on specific policies or actions. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.