Jake Tapper

The statement by Susie Wiles addresses public concerns related to the handling of the Epstein files by AG Bondi, which is a matter of public interest and accountability. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting a failure in handling important legal documents. The statement implies a lack of transparency and accountability in a public office, which is a substantive issue in civic dialogue.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement is critical but does not appear to use harmful language beyond the critique itself, so it does not violate the principle of doing no harm.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the competence of a public official, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement is accusatory and does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism, as it does not provide a platform for AG Bondi to respond or engage in a discussion. [-1]