Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a discussion about a political strategy related to Venezuela, which is a public issue. It presents a perspective on the U.S. administration's approach to foreign policy, specifically regarding Venezuela and its leader, Maduro. The tone appears to be informal and somewhat speculative, as it references a conversation over lunch and includes a personal opinion about the strategy's effectiveness.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the casual mention of 'blowing boats up' could be seen as insensitive to the potential consequences of such actions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does involve a sensitive topic that could impact the dignity of those involved.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it discusses a violent strategy in a casual manner. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without inviting discussion or considering alternative perspectives. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement touches on free speech but does not use the platform responsibly, as it discusses a serious issue in a flippant manner. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.