In reply to:
Mild Billy Donovan
@MildBillDonovan
·
1d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
2d
The statement engages in a public discourse about the implications of the phrase 'Global Intifada' and its potential impact on public perception and safety. The tone is confrontational and seeks clarification on the implications of the phrase, suggesting a critique of its use.
- The statement implies harm by questioning if people deserved to die, which can be seen as insensitive and potentially harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct hate speech but touches on sensitive topics that could be perceived as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses a confrontational tone. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a rhetorical question that could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.