Michael Schellenberger

The statement 'Bonkers' is a dismissive response to a complex discussion about government interference, censorship, and intelligence activities. It does not engage substantively with the issues raised, such as the role of intelligence agencies and the EU's actions regarding free speech and transparency.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not strive to do harm, but its dismissive nature does not contribute positively to the discourse.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it dismisses the ongoing discussion without engaging with the content. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it merely labels the conversation as 'bonkers' without providing reasoning or evidence. [-1]