The statement 'You’re getting on my case about a two-word retweet?' is part of a public discourse as it engages with a broader conversation about prioritizing global and national issues. The original tweet by @mtaibbi about a concert cancellation in Paris is met with criticism for not addressing more pressing issues like genocide, US foreign policy, and gun violence. The response questions the focus on a seemingly trivial matter in light of more significant global concerns.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but it dismisses the concerns raised about prioritizing significant issues, which could be seen as neglecting the impact of words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it deflects from the serious issues raised. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead focuses on defending the retweet without addressing the criticism's substance. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.