In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
7d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing geopolitical dynamics and potential international conflicts involving Venezuela and the United States. It contributes to a broader conversation about foreign policy and military intervention.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies potential conflict, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on potential conflict rather than peaceful resolution. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not offer constructive dialogue or criticism either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to discuss international relations, which is a responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.