Vivek Ramaswamy

Rank 14 of 47

Score 78

Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy

No, being able to trace one’s lineage back to the Mayflower doesn’t excuse one’s unwillingness to swear allegiance to the U.S., or believe in the rule of law, freedom of conscience and expression, colorblind meritocracy, and constitutional government. And yes, I’ll take a 1st

Matt Walsh

@MattWalshBlog

Here is a fatal flaw in this argument, and not the only one: what about an American who can trace his ancestry back 400 years in this country but who DOESN’T fully agree with “the creed of the American founding,” however Vivek defines it? Is he less American than a Somali who

12/18/2025, 4:31:38 PM

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing American identity and values, emphasizing that lineage does not determine one's allegiance to American principles. It argues for the importance of embracing foundational American values over ancestral ties.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement promotes the idea that allegiance to American values is more important than ancestry, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for inclusivity. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding and empathy by suggesting that anyone who embraces American values is equally American, regardless of their lineage. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a counterargument about American identity and values without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]