Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick
@ReichlinMelnick
·
10d
The statement expresses strong criticism of the Trump administration's expansion of the travel ban, characterizing it as 'racist cruelty' and suggesting it aims to alter the country's demographics. The tone is accusatory and emotionally charged, focusing on the perceived discriminatory nature of the policy.
- The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words, as it uses inflammatory language that could incite division. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of others, particularly by making personal attacks on individuals like Trump and Stephen Miller. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a highly polarized manner. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It fails to engage in constructive criticism, opting instead for personal attacks rather than a reasoned critique of the policy. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.