Jake Tapper

Rank 9 of 47
|
Score 106

The statement is a response to a conversation about Norman Podhoretz, a public intellectual, and criticizes certain works as 'fourth-rate' and 'anti-Semitic.' The tone is dismissive and confrontational, suggesting a preference for more substantive reading material. The intent appears to be to elevate certain intellectual standards while denigrating others, potentially engaging in public discourse about intellectualism and anti-Semitism.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses dismissive language that could be considered harmful or disrespectful, particularly in its reference to 'anti-Semitic flotsam.' [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the dismissive tone could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of others. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a dismissive and confrontational approach. [-2]