The statement addresses public spending on security for a governor's residence, which is a public issue. It suggests that the expenditure is justified due to safety concerns, contrasting with criticism of the spending. The tone is defensive, aiming to justify the costs by highlighting potential threats.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to justify security spending by highlighting safety concerns, aligning with the principle of doing no harm.
 [+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.By emphasizing safety, it promotes understanding of the need for security measures, aligning with promoting empathy and compassion.
 [+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a rationale for the spending, rather than attacking critics.
 [+1]