In reply to:
Coffee and Chocolate Games
@RealCoffeeChoco
·
6d
The conversation involves a satirical discussion about the naming of a cultural institution, referencing historical figures and current political figures. The tone is humorous and critical, questioning the relevance of past wishes in current decisions.
- The statement uses humor and satire, which can be seen as harmless, but it may also be perceived as disrespectful to some.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does question the relevance of a historical figure's wishes.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more focused on critique and satire. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in critique but does not resort to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.