Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement criticizes a document release by the DOJ, suggesting it fails to comply with a law recently signed by a former president. It supports a claim made by a public figure, indicating a concern for legal compliance and transparency.
- The statement aims to highlight a perceived failure in legal compliance, which could be seen as striving to prevent harm by advocating for transparency. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By supporting another public figure's claim, the statement promotes understanding of the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the DOJ's actions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.