Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
Helmut Brandstätter MdEP
@HBrandstaetter
·
3d
The statement and related conversations engage in public discourse by addressing international censorship, freedom of speech, and economic impacts. The tone is critical and defensive, focusing on perceived threats to American sovereignty and free speech from European regulations.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy or dignity of others, as it broadly criticizes European governments without engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and instead uses accusatory language, which may hinder productive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to influence public opinion and policy by advocating for sanctions, but it does so in a manner that may not promote societal betterment due to its confrontational tone. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.