Jake Tapper

The statement expresses disappointment and concern over a public debate involving opinions on Israel. It reflects a critical stance on how the discourse is unfolding, suggesting a perceived negative shift in the conversation.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm but expresses a negative sentiment about the discourse.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy but could be seen as dismissive of differing opinions. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on disappointment. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It critiques the discourse but does not engage constructively or offer solutions. [-1]