Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement critiques the DOJ's response to the Epstein Files Transparency Act, suggesting that the DOJ is not complying with the law by withholding materials under privilege claims. The tone is accusatory, implying misconduct by the DOJ.
- The statement accuses the DOJ of flaunting the law, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the DOJ, as it accuses them of wrongdoing without providing evidence, potentially violating this principle. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it makes a strong accusation without offering a basis for discussion or understanding, violating this principle. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.