Jake Tapper

Rank 9 of 47

Score 107

Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅

-8

If you can read this whole thread and not come away believing that Candace Owens is a vicious anti-Semite, consider donating your brain to science so that we might one day understand the neurological basis of extreme denial.

Noam Dworman

@noam_dworman

Hold the presses!

My schpidey-sense told me to look into the book, "The Talmudic Jew," by August Rohling, that Candace is holding up in her latest video.

It tells us a tremendous amount about Candace Owens.

12/21/2025, 10:57:10 AM

The statement is accusatory and uses strong language to criticize Candace Owens, suggesting she is an anti-Semite based on her association with a controversial book. It employs sarcasm and hyperbole, which can undermine constructive dialogue.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement uses harsh language, which could be seen as harmful. [-2]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It does not respect the dignity of the individual being criticized, potentially engaging in harassment. [-2]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on condemnation rather than dialogue. [-2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
It does not engage in constructive criticism, instead opting for personal attacks. [-2]