Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a discrepancy between two accounts regarding the departure of Eric Siebert, which is relevant to public discourse as it touches on issues of transparency and accountability within the government. The conversation raises questions about the influence of political figures on legal proceedings.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights a potential issue of misinformation or miscommunication.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but involves public figures and their actions, which are of public interest.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but presents conflicting information that could benefit from clarification. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.