The statement critiques the decision to withhold a news story, suggesting it was influenced by political bias rather than journalistic standards. It implies a lack of transparency and accountability in editorial decisions, raising concerns about media integrity and freedom of the press.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by editorial decisions that may prioritize political interests over factual reporting.Ā [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but challenges the dignity of the editorial process by questioning its integrity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging transparency and accountability in journalism.Ā [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of the editorial decision without personal attacks.Ā [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for journalistic integrity and the public's right to information.Ā [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.