Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
Michael M. Grynbaum
@grynbaum
·
1d
The statement critiques a public reaction to a newsroom decision, suggesting it was inappropriate and damaging to the individual's reputation. It implies a lack of professionalism in handling internal disputes publicly.
- The statement suggests that the public reaction was harmful, indicating a violation of the principle to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By calling the reaction a 'meltdown,' it may not fully respect the dignity of the person involved, potentially violating this principle. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather criticizes the individual's response, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.