The statement critiques a 60 Minutes correspondent, Sharyn Alfonsi, for her past reporting and current complaints about CBS management. It highlights a previous incident where her reporting was deemed 'intentionally false' by both political sides. The tone is critical and aims to question Alfonsi's credibility and journalistic integrity.
- The statement does not directly harm with words but implies harm to Alfonsi's reputation by highlighting past mistakes. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as undermining dignity by focusing on past errors. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather criticizes without offering a platform for response. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct mistakes but points out past errors of another.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses free speech to critique a public figure, which is within rights, but the tone could be more balanced.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.