Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
Michael M. Grynbaum
@grynbaum
·
1d
The statement criticizes media integrity and accuses '60 Minutes' of partisanship, suggesting a lack of journalistic integrity and bias. It implies that media outlets prioritize their narratives over impartial reporting.
- The statement is accusatory and could be seen as harmful to the reputation of the media outlet, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It challenges the integrity of media professionals, which may not respect their dignity, thus potentially violating this principle. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on personal attacks against the media's integrity. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.