Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -90

The statement criticizes offshore wind energy by highlighting perceived negative impacts on the environment, economy, and safety. It engages in public discourse by addressing energy policy and its implications on various sectors, including environmental and economic concerns. The tone is critical and aims to persuade against offshore wind energy by listing potential harms.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by spreading potentially misleading or exaggerated claims about offshore wind energy without providing evidence or context. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on negative aspects without acknowledging potential benefits or alternative perspectives. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without inviting discussion or considering counterarguments. [-1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to sway public opinion against offshore wind energy, but it does not necessarily aim for the betterment of society as it lacks a balanced perspective. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly, as it could contribute to misinformation or fear without substantiated evidence. [-1]