Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
Rebecca Downs🇺🇸🟦🇮🇱
@RebeccaRoseGold
·
17d
The statement and accompanying content engage in public discourse by addressing educational policies related to LGBTQ+ and racial justice in Ohio's classrooms. The tone is critical and suggests a negative view of these initiatives, implying they are being pushed by specific individuals and groups.
- The statement may cause harm by framing educational initiatives in a negative light without providing a balanced perspective, potentially fostering misunderstanding. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals mentioned, as it targets them in a potentially accusatory manner. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it presents the initiatives as negative without exploring their potential benefits. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and instead uses a rhetorical question to imply wrongdoing, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.