-1
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
1d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
1d
The statement critiques '60 Minutes' for alleged biased reporting and manipulation, suggesting a need for accountability in media. It questions the integrity of the program by citing specific instances of alleged misinformation and censorship. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived media bias and lack of transparency.
- The statement aims to hold media accountable, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for truthful reporting. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but challenges the dignity of the media outlet by accusing it of bias without providing evidence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on accusations rather than solutions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.