Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
1086d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
2d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
2d
The statement criticizes '60 Minutes' for promoting controversial views on overpopulation, using strong language to express disapproval. It engages in public discourse by addressing media responsibility and ethical reporting.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of those it criticizes, using derogatory language. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on condemnation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, opting for personal attacks instead. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.