Jake Tapper

The statement questions the redaction of names related to a high-profile criminal case, which is a matter of public interest and transparency in legal proceedings.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement raises a question about transparency, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by seeking accountability. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy by not revealing names, but questions the redaction, which could imply a desire for disclosure.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The question promotes understanding by encouraging discussion about legal transparency and accountability. [+1]