In reply to:
Chuck Ross
@ChuckRossDC
·
2d
The statement 'Makes sense' is a brief agreement with a critique of a journalist's past work, which is part of a larger conversation about media integrity and bias. This conversation involves public figures and media practices, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but supports a narrative that could harm reputations without providing evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it participates in a conversation that could be seen as undermining the dignity of the journalist involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it simply agrees with a negative portrayal without further discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement is part of a public discourse on media practices, which is a legitimate use of free speech, but it lacks responsibility and integrity by not providing a balanced view.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.