Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -82

The statement is a strong critique of the ceasefire between Israel and Palestine, suggesting it is a deceptive tactic by the US and Israel. It calls for continued activism and support for Palestine, reflecting a tone of urgency and skepticism.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially incite further tension and conflict, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct hate speech but could be seen as inflammatory, potentially affecting the dignity of those involved. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes a specific viewpoint and encourages activism, which can foster understanding among like-minded individuals but may not promote empathy across differing perspectives.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and could be seen as dismissive of opposing views. [-1]