Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -82

The statement is a critique of political leaders, contrasting their perceived inaction with Greta Thunberg's activism. It uses hyperbolic language to emphasize Thunberg's courage and criticize 'armchair warriors' in positions of power. The context involves a protest related to Palestine, highlighting issues of activism and political response.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight perceived inaction by political leaders, which could be seen as promoting accountability, but the language is somewhat dismissive.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes empathy towards activists like Thunberg, but it does so by disparaging others, which may not fully align with promoting understanding. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of political leaders, but it uses a personal attack ('armchair warriors'), which detracts from constructive dialogue. [-1]