Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47
|
Score -143
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
114d
🚨TWITTER FILES – FRANCE

At this moment, the Trump administration is negotiating with the EU over final obstacles to a trade deal, one of which is European censorship of US social media platforms.

Many analysts believe the massive size of the EU will lead US social media firms
12/24/2025, 1:06:38 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
2d
Swamp creature
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
531d
The European Commission says it wants to protect free speech but admits it will decide what Google, Facebook, and X censor. And now, Public has discovered that the EU's top censorship official is a former French defense contractor specializing in mass spying and censorship.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
2d
Your deep state swamp creature @ThierryBreton interfered in a US presidential election which led @vonderleyen to fire him with your permission. Now you’re trying to censor your enemies because you have a 17% approval rating & can’t govern.
Merry Christmas!
Emmanuel Macron
@EmmanuelMacron
·
2d
France condemns the visa restriction measures taken by the United States against Thierry Breton and four other European figures.

These measures amount to intimidation and coercion aimed at undermining European digital sovereignty.

The statement and its context involve a critique of political figures and policies, focusing on censorship and approval ratings. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting a lack of governance capability and interference in political processes.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by making unsubstantiated claims about censorship and governance, potentially misleading the public. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals involved, using derogatory language and accusations without clear evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive criticism and engages in personal attacks, reducing the potential for meaningful dialogue. [-2]