In reply to:
Christopher Landau
@DeputySecState
·
3d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues of censorship, digital sovereignty, and international relations. It questions France's stance on a letter from Thierry Breton regarding compliance with the Digital Services Act (DSA) and its implications for freedom of expression.
- The statement raises concerns about potential censorship, which could be seen as promoting harm reduction in terms of free speech, but it does not explicitly strive to do no harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public figures and policy issues without engaging in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by highlighting a potential conflict between digital sovereignty and freedom of expression, but it lacks empathy or compassion in its tone.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning France's actions, but it does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.