Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement questions the U.S. commitment to NATO in light of perceived threats to its Constitution and freedoms by EU countries. It reflects a critical stance on international alliances and raises concerns about mutual defense obligations.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm to national interests, suggesting a need to reassess alliances. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It implies criticism of EU countries, which could be seen as disrespectful, but does not engage in direct hate speech or harassment.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement invites dialogue on international relations and defense commitments, though it could be more constructive.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.