The statement and conversation involve allegations against government agencies and organizations, accusing them of censorship and misinformation. The tone is accusatory and suggests a conspiracy to suppress free speech. It questions the legitimacy of certain organizations and their actions under the Digital Services Act.
- The statement potentially causes harm by making serious accusations without evidence, which could mislead or incite distrust. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the privacy and dignity of individuals and organizations, labeling them as deceptive without substantiated proof. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive dialogue and engages in personal attacks, referring to individuals and organizations as 'fake' and 'censors.' [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to spread a narrative that could undermine trust in public institutions, which may not contribute to societal betterment. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- While it raises concerns about free speech, it does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible, lacking evidence and potentially spreading misinformation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.