Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement critiques the European Union's policies, suggesting a contradiction between its stated commitment to free speech and its actual practices of censorship under the guise of regulation. The tone is critical and aims to highlight perceived hypocrisy in EU policies.
- The statement does not directly harm others but criticizes EU policies, which is a legitimate form of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, as it focuses on policy critique rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is primarily critical.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of EU policies, which is constructive in nature, but it does not provide a platform for dialogue or alternative perspectives. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by critiquing perceived censorship, aligning with the responsible use of a platform to discuss public issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.