Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement criticizes the DOJ for alleged illegal actions and questions the professionalism of their communication. It engages in public discourse by addressing legal and ethical concerns about government transparency and conduct.
- The statement accuses the DOJ of illegal actions, which could be harmful if unsubstantiated. It does not strive to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The use of the term 'dope' in the DOJ's alleged response could be seen as disrespectful, potentially violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on accusations rather than solutions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.