In reply to:
Pavel Durov
@durov
·
4d
Under Secretary of State Sarah B. Rogers
@UnderSecPD
·
5d
The statement by @durov criticizes the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA) and Chat Control, suggesting they are tools for censorship and mass surveillance, allegedly used by Macron to suppress dissent. This is a strong critique of EU policies, framing them as threats to freedom.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It accuses specific individuals and policies of censorship, which could be seen as disrespectful and lacking in empathy. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to raise awareness about perceived threats to freedom, aligning with promoting understanding of these issues. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead using accusatory language. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against the DSA and Chat Control, aiming to protect free speech. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.