Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement critiques the perceived double standards in travel policies between the EU and the US, highlighting the EU's stance on travel as a privilege and contrasting it with the US's actions, which are seen as infringing on European sovereignty. The tone is critical and aims to provoke discussion on international travel rights and diplomatic relations.
- The statement does not directly harm but critiques policies, which can be seen as constructive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but challenges political decisions, not individuals.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting perceived inconsistencies in international policies. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of US policies without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.