The statement involves a significant public issue, namely a military action ordered by a former U.S. President against ISIS terrorists in Nigeria, with implications for international relations, religious persecution, and military policy.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words, but the action it describes involves military force, which inherently involves harm. However, the intent is to target terrorists accused of persecution, which could be seen as a protective measure.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It reports on a military action against a terrorist group.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a straightforward report of a military action. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a factual report of a military decision. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement reflects the use of influence in a significant international military decision, which could be seen as an attempt to protect persecuted groups, aligning with societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on a significant public issue, and it uses the platform responsibly by providing information on a military action. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.