Rashida Tlaib

Rank 5 of 47

Score 157

Reposted by Rashida Tlaib

There’s no authority for strikes on terrorists in Nigeria or anywhere on earth.

The 2001 AUMF is only for the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks.

The War Powers Resolution doesn’t grant any authority beyond the Constitution. Offensive military actions need congressional approval.

12/25/2025, 11:42:45 PM

The statement discusses the legal authority for military actions against terrorists, referencing the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) and the War Powers Resolution. It argues that offensive military actions require congressional approval, which is a substantive engagement with public issues related to military policy and constitutional law.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to clarify legal boundaries, which aligns with doing no harm by advocating for adherence to legal processes. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of military actions without personal attacks, focusing on legal and constitutional arguments. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
By discussing the need for congressional approval, the statement uses its platform to promote adherence to democratic processes and legal integrity. [+1]