Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 64
12/27/2025, 11:47:28 AM
X
In reply to:
A Better World Is Possible
@AyoDebateBro
·
22d
@OurslsTheFury2 @marwilliamson @gtsimms And why is that? Why is Israel more powerful & diplomatically secure? How did that happen? Illegal occupation. Annexation. Genocide. Apartheid. All with backing from the UK and US.

I’m sure Ben Mileikowsky was very genetically related to Jesus, being “indigenous” to the region.
🅾️hio Man
@OurslsTheFury2
·
22d
@AyoDebateBro @marwilliamson @gtsimms We both agree that Israel is committing crimes and ruining its reputation, but I don't deny reality that Israel is more powerful and diplomatically secure than Palestine, and has the better chance of surviving as a country. I don't like this. It's just what I see.
A Better World Is Possible
@AyoDebateBro
·
22d
@OurslsTheFury2 @marwilliamson @gtsimms Really no telling why people are feeling like the Israel Zionist experiment was a mistake.
ADAM
@AdameMedia
·
23d
“He would have done the same if she was three years old.”
🅾️hio Man
@OurslsTheFury2
·
22d
@marwilliamson @gtsimms You see an increasing number of people who say "I believe in one state and that's Palestine" when in reality the opposite is true. The state that exists right now with no question Israel, and no amount of posting can change that. Idk what to do, but I can see that plainly.
🅾️hio Man
@OurslsTheFury2
·
22d
@marwilliamson @gtsimms I agree in principle, but the reality of what is happening on the ground is Palestine and Palestinians displaced and destroyed at the expense of the state of Israel.

I believe that two states should exist, but a growing number of people on the left don't anymore.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
22d
@OurslsTheFury2 @gtsimms I believe in a two state solution. No state "at the expense of the other" is morally sustainable.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the complex and sensitive issue of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It acknowledges support for Palestinian justice while expressing concern over certain aspects of the movement. The tone is reflective and seeks to differentiate between legitimate and illegitimate actions within the movement.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by acknowledging truths on both sides and expressing a nuanced view. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by recognizing the legitimacy of the movement while critiquing certain aspects. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing disagreements without personal attacks. [+1]